How Partisan Media Covered the Supreme Court’s Trump Immunity Decision
On July 9, 2020, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down a decision in the case of Trump v. Vance, ruling that President Trump is not immune from criminal investigation while in office. The decision was a blow to the Trump administration, which had argued that the president should be immune from such investigations.
As expected, the decision was met with a flurry of reactions from both sides of the political spectrum. Partisan media outlets wasted no time in spinning the decision to fit their own narratives, with some praising the ruling as a victory for the rule of law, while others decried it as a politically motivated attack on the president.
Conservative media outlets, such as Fox News and Breitbart, were quick to criticize the decision, framing it as a partisan attack on President Trump. They argued that the ruling was a violation of the president’s constitutional rights and an attempt to undermine his authority. Some commentators even went so far as to suggest that the decision was part of a larger conspiracy to take down the president.
On the other hand, liberal media outlets, like MSNBC and The New York Times, hailed the decision as a victory for accountability and the rule of law. They argued that the ruling was a necessary check on presidential power and a step towards holding the president accountable for any potential wrongdoing. Some commentators even suggested that the decision was a sign that the Supreme Court was willing to stand up to the Trump administration and uphold the principles of justice.
Overall, the coverage of the Supreme Court’s Trump immunity decision by partisan media outlets was predictably divided along political lines. Conservatives saw it as a partisan attack on the president, while liberals saw it as a necessary check on presidential power. As the 2020 election approaches, it is likely that this decision will continue to be a hot-button issue for both sides of the political spectrum.